PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
34.52%
Positive growth while MU shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
34.95%
Cost growth 50-75% of MU's 58.74%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
33.80%
Positive growth while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.53%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.32%
R&D growth less than half of MU's 1.56%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.35%
Operating expenses growth less than half of MU's 20.24%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
28.35%
Total costs growth 50-75% of MU's 48.62%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.85%
D&A growth above 1.5x MU's 0.72%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
69.40%
EBITDA growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.69%
EBITDA margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
65.60%
Operating income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.11%
Operating margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-31.21%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
63.05%
Pre-tax income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.21%
Pre-tax margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
63.04%
Tax expense growth less than half of MU's 858.39%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
63.05%
Net income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.21%
Net margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
50.00%
EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
80.00%
Diluted EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.13%
Share count reduction below 50% of MU's 0.27%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
4.21%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MU's 0.28%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.