176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
17.04%
Positive growth while MU shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
20.17%
Cost increase while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
11.76%
Gross profit growth below 50% of MU's 82.17%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.51%
Margin decline while MU shows 80.53% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
17.89%
R&D growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 13.19%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize investment rationale.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-31.32%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
8.66%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x MU's 0.35%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
17.76%
Total costs growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while MU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-13.07%
D&A reduction while MU shows 1.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
10.82%
EBITDA growth below 50% of MU's 101.92%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-5.99%
EBITDA margin decline while MU shows 102.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
13.92%
Operating income growth below 50% of MU's 36.57%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.67%
Operating margin decline while MU shows 30.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
49.61%
Other expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.32%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of MU's 36.58%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.33%
Pre-tax margin decline while MU shows 30.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
14.32%
Tax expense growth while MU reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.32%
Net income growth below 50% of MU's 46.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.33%
Net margin decline while MU shows 41.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
27.78%
EPS growth 50-75% of MU's 46.39%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
8.33%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of MU's 46.39%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-14.98%
Share count reduction while MU shows 0.22% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
3.01%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MU's 0.20%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.