PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-26.70%
Revenue decline while MU shows 14.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-12.71%
Cost reduction while MU shows 39.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-52.07%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-34.61%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.02%
R&D growth 50-75% of MU's 12.69%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-62.88%
Other expenses reduction while MU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
3.52%
Operating expenses growth less than half of MU's 45.28%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-9.58%
Total costs reduction while MU shows 41.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.66%
D&A growth above 1.5x MU's 3.43%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-95.26%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-78.77%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-94.74%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-92.82%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.59%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-93.69%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-91.39%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-93.69%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-93.69%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-91.39%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-93.48%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-92.31%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.07%
Share count reduction below 50% of MU's 0.33%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-7.56%
Diluted share reduction while MU shows 0.33% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.