PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.71%
Positive growth while MU shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.79%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
8.96%
Gross profit growth below 50% of MU's 131.71%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.19%
Margin expansion below 50% of MU's 133.97%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.96%
R&D growth while MU reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1574.30%
Other expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
69.97%
Operating expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.08%
Total costs growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.91%
D&A growth while MU reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-650.53%
EBITDA decline while MU shows 138.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
36.88%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of MU's 168.58%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-912.75%
Operating income decline while MU shows 69.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-907.05%
Operating margin decline while MU shows 67.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
9.70%
Other expenses growth less than half of MU's 88.22%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-748.05%
Pre-tax income decline while MU shows 68.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-743.50%
Pre-tax margin decline while MU shows 65.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-165.30%
Tax expense reduction while MU shows 35.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1025.69%
Net income decline while MU shows 65.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1019.20%
Net margin decline while MU shows 62.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-966.67%
EPS decline while MU shows 65.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-966.67%
Diluted EPS decline while MU shows 65.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.68%
Share count reduction below 50% of MU's 0.18%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-9.15%
Diluted share reduction while MU shows 0.18% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.