PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-13.64%
Revenue decline while MU shows 24.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-9.49%
Cost reduction while MU shows 14.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-21.56%
Gross profit decline while MU shows 68.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-9.16%
Margin decline while MU shows 35.40% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
3.38%
R&D growth less than half of MU's 12.22%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while MU shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
10.60%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x MU's 6.33%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-4.92%
Total costs reduction while MU shows 12.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.33%
D&A growth 1.1-1.25x MU's 4.59%. Bill Ackman would demand investment justification.
-69.32%
EBITDA decline while MU shows 56.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-42.96%
EBITDA margin decline while MU shows 27.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-62.75%
Operating income decline while MU shows 120.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-56.87%
Operating margin decline while MU shows 116.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.28%
Other expenses reduction while MU shows 32.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-61.23%
Pre-tax income decline while MU shows 114.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-55.11%
Pre-tax margin decline while MU shows 111.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-61.23%
Tax expense reduction while MU shows 53.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-61.23%
Net income decline while MU shows 100.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-55.11%
Net margin decline while MU shows 100.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-60.00%
EPS decline while MU shows 100.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-60.00%
Diluted EPS decline while MU shows 100.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.32%
Share count reduction while MU shows 4.02% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.23%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x MU's 4.45%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.