PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
13.53%
Positive growth while MU shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
18.46%
Cost increase while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
2.69%
Positive growth while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-9.55%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
10.64%
R&D growth above 1.5x MU's 0.80%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.11%
Operating expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.92%
Total costs growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.89%
D&A growth while MU reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-6.51%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.89%
EBITDA margin decline while MU shows 4.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.51%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.65%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
8.97%
Other expenses growth less than half of MU's 27.45%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-5.49%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16.75%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-70.33%
Tax expense reduction while MU shows 12.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
22.30%
Net income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.72%
Net margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.00%
EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.00%
Diluted EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.92%
Share count reduction below 50% of MU's 1.48%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
3.95%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MU's 1.04%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.