PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.72%
Revenue growth below 50% of MU's 12.69%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
6.71%
Cost increase while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
3.20%
Gross profit growth below 50% of MU's 56.29%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.38%
Margin decline while MU shows 38.68% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
11.33%
R&D growth while MU reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.42%
Similar operating expenses growth to MU's 9.20%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
7.37%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MU's 0.96%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.48%
D&A growth above 1.5x MU's 1.52%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
69.30%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 41.85%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
19.39%
EBITDA margin growth 50-75% of MU's 33.69%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-37.64%
Operating income decline while MU shows 1645.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-41.01%
Operating margin decline while MU shows 1471.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-583.39%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-79.17%
Pre-tax income decline while MU shows 1071.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-80.30%
Pre-tax margin decline while MU shows 961.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-131.98%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-73.68%
Net income decline while MU shows 421.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-75.10%
Net margin decline while MU shows 385.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-76.92%
EPS decline while MU shows 418.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-75.00%
Diluted EPS decline while MU shows 395.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.89%
Share count reduction below 50% of MU's 0.16%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-0.85%
Diluted share reduction while MU shows 9.67% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.