PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.36%
Revenue decline while MU shows 3.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-2.20%
Cost reduction while MU shows 13.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-5.87%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.60%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.86%
R&D growth above 1.5x MU's 2.02%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.07%
Operating expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.95%
Total costs growth less than half of MU's 8.69%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.83%
D&A growth above 1.5x MU's 1.12%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-84.09%
EBITDA decline while MU shows 153.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-38.88%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-84.09%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-83.54%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.37%
Other expenses reduction while MU shows 31.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-76.02%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-75.19%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-76.02%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-76.02%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-75.19%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-72.73%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-70.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.65%
Share count reduction below 50% of MU's 0.17%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-0.59%
Diluted share reduction while MU shows 0.11% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.