PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
13.05%
Positive growth while MU shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
10.41%
Cost growth above 1.5x MU's 1.44%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
19.02%
Positive growth while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
5.28%
Margin expansion while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.88%
R&D growth above 1.5x MU's 1.32%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.24%
Operating expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.64%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MU's 0.25%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.20%
D&A reduction while MU shows 0.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
656.99%
EBITDA growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
64.14%
EBITDA margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
656.99%
Operating income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
569.59%
Operating margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
38.12%
Other expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
405.53%
Pre-tax income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
347.16%
Pre-tax margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
405.47%
Tax expense growth while MU reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
405.55%
Net income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
347.18%
Net margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
333.33%
EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
333.33%
Diluted EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.13%
Share count reduction while MU shows 0.17% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-2.61%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.