PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.55%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-4.39%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
3.51%
Positive growth while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
5.14%
Margin expansion while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.12%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.63%
Operating expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2.54%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.48%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
34.37%
EBITDA growth below 50% of MU's 668.59%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.48%
EBITDA margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.06%
Operating income growth below 50% of MU's 199.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.71%
Operating margin growth below 50% of MU's 233.15%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
19.35%
Other expenses growth less than half of MU's 3400.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
5.84%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of MU's 220.06%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.50%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of MU's 255.81%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-35.33%
Tax expense reduction while MU shows 3400.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
16.13%
Net income growth below 50% of MU's 208.31%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
17.95%
Net margin growth below 50% of MU's 242.74%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
15.63%
EPS growth below 50% of MU's 190.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.00%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of MU's 200.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.18%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x MU's 1.75%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.19%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x MU's 1.06%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.