PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.50%
Revenue growth below 50% of MU's 7.13%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-0.57%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
4.89%
Gross profit growth below 50% of MU's 40.34%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.34%
Margin expansion below 50% of MU's 31.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.47%
R&D growth 50-75% of MU's 4.81%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.92%
Operating expenses growth less than half of MU's 488.33%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
3.46%
Total costs growth less than half of MU's 21.86%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.02%
D&A reduction while MU shows 17.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-8.08%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.23%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of MU's 40.13%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-10.62%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.94%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
17.76%
Other expenses growth less than half of MU's 117.14%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-8.88%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.23%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
19.29%
Tax expense growth while MU reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-12.81%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-14.09%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.51%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.09%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.65%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x MU's 7.12%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
1.38%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MU's 0.77%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.