PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.84%
Positive growth while MU shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.60%
Cost increase while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
1.17%
Positive growth while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.33%
Margin expansion while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.96%
R&D growth less than half of MU's 32.79%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.38%
Operating expenses growth less than half of MU's 17.77%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
1.82%
Total costs growth 50-75% of MU's 2.89%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.74%
D&A growth less than half of MU's 10.53%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-4.84%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.66%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.84%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.63%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.67%
Other expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.33%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.12%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.32%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-4.33%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.12%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.33%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.63%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.66%
Share count reduction below 50% of MU's 0.22%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-1.22%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.