PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
19.35%
Positive growth while MU shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
23.08%
Cost growth above 1.5x MU's 11.03%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
14.31%
Positive growth while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-4.22%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
10.59%
R&D growth while MU reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.20%
Operating expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
18.80%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MU's 1.92%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.40%
D&A growth 50-75% of MU's 5.71%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
22.75%
EBITDA growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.57%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
22.75%
Operating income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.85%
Operating margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.06%
Other expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
22.78%
Pre-tax income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.87%
Pre-tax margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
22.78%
Tax expense growth less than half of MU's 50.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
22.78%
Net income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.87%
Net margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
19.05%
EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.62%
Diluted EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.64%
Share count reduction below 50% of MU's 0.16%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
1.39%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MU's 0.16%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.