PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.94%
Revenue decline while MU shows 6.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-5.89%
Cost reduction while MU shows 21.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-1.44%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.59%
Margin expansion while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-2.44%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.36%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-5.04%
Total costs reduction while MU shows 12.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while MU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-8.63%
D&A reduction while MU shows 6.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-18.26%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.06%
EBITDA margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.97%
Operating income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.15%
Operating margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.63%
Other expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.47%
Pre-tax income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.63%
Pre-tax margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
280.21%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x MU's 16.67%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-19.11%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.80%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.76%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.12%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.34%
Share count reduction while MU shows 0.26% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.03%
Diluted share reduction while MU shows 0.26% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.