PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.78%
Positive growth while MU shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
10.15%
Cost increase while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
11.54%
Positive growth while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.69%
Margin expansion while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.23%
R&D reduction while MU shows 10.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.14%
Operating expenses growth less than half of MU's 186.11%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
6.75%
Total costs growth less than half of MU's 19.14%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.78%
D&A growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 1.39%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize asset base.
53.39%
EBITDA growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.65%
EBITDA margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.81%
Operating income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.08%
Operating margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
28.29%
Other expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
30.60%
Pre-tax income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
17.90%
Pre-tax margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.60%
Tax expense growth while MU reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
30.60%
Net income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
17.90%
Net margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.00%
EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.91%
Diluted EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.12%
Share count reduction below 50% of MU's 0.06%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.92%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MU's 0.06%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.