PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
7.81%
Positive growth while MU shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
8.85%
Cost growth above 1.5x MU's 4.41%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
6.60%
Positive growth while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.12%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.08%
R&D growth while MU reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.24%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x MU's 1.51%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
8.35%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MU's 3.97%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.83%
D&A growth above 1.5x MU's 3.70%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
6.61%
EBITDA growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.37%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.91%
Operating income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.76%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.20%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
4.91%
Pre-tax income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.69%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-26.43%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
9.05%
Net income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.15%
Net margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.09%
EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
26.32%
Diluted EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.46%
Diluted share reduction while MU shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.