PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-22.60%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
16.32%
Cost increase while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-70.88%
Gross profit decline while MU shows 40.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-62.38%
Margin decline while MU shows 16.04% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.71%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.10%
Operating expenses reduction while MU shows 16.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
10.28%
Total costs growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.96%
D&A growth while MU reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-153.74%
EBITDA decline while MU shows 0.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-154.98%
EBITDA margin decline while MU shows 192.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-176.56%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-198.91%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.42%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-168.82%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-188.92%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-170.89%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-168.40%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-188.37%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-167.50%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-172.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.05%
Share count reduction while MU shows 0.08% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-6.18%
Diluted share reduction while MU shows 0.08% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.