PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.56%
Revenue growth below 50% of MU's 11.38%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-28.67%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
145.36%
Similar gross profit growth to MU's 140.07%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
144.00%
Similar margin change to MU's 135.98%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry pricing power.
-0.26%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.85%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-20.57%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.47%
D&A growth while MU reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
204.91%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of MU's 297.20%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
220.33%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 113.87%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
136.55%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 65.25%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
136.35%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 68.80%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-52.15%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
141.61%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 62.26%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
141.38%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 66.12%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
97.10%
Tax expense growth while MU reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
151.06%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 61.38%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
150.78%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 65.33%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
151.85%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 62.89%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
151.85%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 62.89%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-2.09%
Share count reduction while MU shows 5.09% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
1.64%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x MU's 5.09%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.