PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-46.40%
Revenue decline while MU shows 17.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-35.93%
Cost reduction while MU shows 13.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-61.49%
Gross profit decline while MU shows 58.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-28.15%
Margin decline while MU shows 34.96% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.27%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
222.24%
Other expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.48%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-23.40%
Total costs reduction while MU shows 0.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.53%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-194.81%
EBITDA decline while MU shows 57.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-228.36%
EBITDA margin decline while MU shows 32.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-408.27%
Operating income decline while MU shows 80.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-675.13%
Operating margin decline while MU shows 83.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
11.91%
Other expenses growth less than half of MU's 31.91%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-379.29%
Pre-tax income decline while MU shows 71.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-621.07%
Pre-tax margin decline while MU shows 75.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2948.32%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-339.14%
Net income decline while MU shows 69.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-546.16%
Net margin decline while MU shows 74.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-346.43%
EPS decline while MU shows 72.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-342.86%
Diluted EPS decline while MU shows 72.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.13%
Share count reduction while MU shows 3.69% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-3.67%
Diluted share reduction while MU shows 3.81% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.