PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
38.05%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 33.64%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
39.79%
Cost growth above 1.5x MU's 14.58%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
33.90%
Gross profit growth below 50% of MU's 160.59%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.01%
Margin decline while MU shows 94.99% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
42.51%
R&D growth while MU reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while MU shows 164.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
41.06%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x MU's 17.39%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
40.38%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MU's 15.01%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.42%
D&A change of 5.42% while MU maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-66.18%
EBITDA decline while MU shows 69.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-48.31%
EBITDA margin decline while MU shows 13.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-31.92%
Operating income decline while MU shows 510.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.44%
Operating margin growth below 50% of MU's 406.95%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
30.50%
Other expenses growth less than half of MU's 109.38%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-31.96%
Pre-tax income decline while MU shows 361.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.42%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of MU's 295.85%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.40%
Tax expense reduction while MU shows 46.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-36.35%
Net income decline while MU shows 331.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.24%
Net margin growth below 50% of MU's 273.46%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-34.78%
EPS decline while MU shows 340.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-36.76%
Diluted EPS decline while MU shows 330.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.87%
Share count reduction below 50% of MU's 0.36%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-0.28%
Diluted share reduction while MU shows 18.52% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.