PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.78%
Similar revenue growth to MU's 8.96%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
6.32%
Cost growth less than half of MU's 18.89%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
11.98%
Positive growth while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.94%
Margin expansion while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
9.25%
R&D growth less than half of MU's 38.73%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.22%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of MU's 12.14%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
6.64%
Total costs growth less than half of MU's 17.68%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-39.02%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-1.76%
D&A reduction while MU shows 6.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
87.46%
EBITDA growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
73.85%
EBITDA margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.51%
Operating income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.47%
Operating margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
117.57%
Other expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
26.51%
Pre-tax income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.30%
Pre-tax margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
217.30%
Tax expense growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 160.98%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize strategy.
21.84%
Net income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.01%
Net margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.00%
EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.75%
Diluted EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.23%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x MU's 29.05%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.00%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x MU's 8.88%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.