176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.03%
Positive growth while MU shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-33.25%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
191.95%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 9.89%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
180.63%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x MU's 15.95%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-2.90%
R&D reduction while MU shows 13.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.86%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-24.97%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-12.17%
Interest expense reduction while MU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.65%
D&A growth less than half of MU's 12.55%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
180.68%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 19.05%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
156.94%
EBITDA margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
159.23%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 32.40%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
156.94%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 39.71%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-103.21%
Other expenses reduction while MU shows 42.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
161.28%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 42.41%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
158.90%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 50.26%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
166.66%
Similar tax expense growth to MU's 197.14%. Walter Schloss would investigate patterns.
160.20%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 4.17%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
157.87%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 9.91%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
161.29%
EPS change of 161.29% while MU is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
161.29%
Diluted EPS change of 161.29% while MU is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
0.80%
Share count reduction below 50% of MU's 1.09%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
1.73%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MU's 0.42%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.