PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.03%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 0.05%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
1.81%
Cost growth less than half of MU's 9.51%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
8.75%
Positive growth while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.54%
Margin expansion while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
5.40%
R&D growth while MU reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.46%
Operating expenses reduction while MU shows 51.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.53%
Total costs reduction while MU shows 14.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-25.90%
Interest expense reduction while MU shows 7.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1.03%
D&A reduction while MU shows 1.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
135.80%
EBITDA growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
120.11%
Similar EBITDA margin growth to MU's 126.33%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
73.22%
Operating income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
64.93%
Operating margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3194.95%
Other expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
79.47%
Pre-tax income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
70.87%
Pre-tax margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-23.86%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
102.27%
Net income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
92.58%
Net margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
86.84%
EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
86.84%
Diluted EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.06%
Share count increase while MU reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.25%
Diluted share increase while MU reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.