PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.54%
Positive growth while MU shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.81%
Cost increase while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
13.64%
Positive growth while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.70%
Margin expansion while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
7.40%
R&D growth 50-75% of MU's 10.05%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.68%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x MU's 6.32%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
14.23%
Total costs growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
69.91%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x MU's 16.67%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
2.96%
D&A growth above 1.5x MU's 1.62%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-36.72%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-40.53%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.86%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.63%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-73.52%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-15.83%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.45%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
49.18%
Tax expense growth while MU reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-21.22%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-27.42%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.31%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.54%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.95%
Share count increase while MU reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.97%
Diluted share increase while MU reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.