PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-10.60%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-9.08%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-11.98%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.55%
Margin decline while MU shows 3.55% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
4.04%
R&D growth above 1.5x MU's 1.73%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.24%
Operating expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.40%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-74.20%
Interest expense reduction while MU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.94%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-2.38%
EBITDA decline while MU shows 0.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.58%
EBITDA margin decline while MU shows 295.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-37.94%
Operating income decline while MU shows 26.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.58%
Operating margin decline while MU shows 18.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-70.64%
Other expenses reduction while MU shows 40.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-39.17%
Pre-tax income decline while MU shows 19.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-31.96%
Pre-tax margin decline while MU shows 10.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-67.75%
Tax expense reduction while MU shows 136.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-34.92%
Net income decline while MU shows 24.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-27.20%
Net margin decline while MU shows 15.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-34.25%
EPS decline while MU shows 25.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-34.25%
Diluted EPS decline while MU shows 25.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.72%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x MU's 2.53%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.82%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x MU's 2.61%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.