PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
12.91%
Similar revenue growth to MU's 13.30%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
9.11%
Cost growth above 1.5x MU's 5.88%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
16.69%
Gross profit growth below 50% of MU's 68.66%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.35%
Margin expansion below 50% of MU's 48.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.95%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
128.96%
Other expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.70%
Operating expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.17%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MU's 2.91%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
2.27%
Interest expense growth 50-75% of MU's 3.70%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
3.13%
D&A growth while MU reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
91.72%
EBITDA growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
69.80%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of MU's 234.35%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
91.72%
Similar operating income growth to MU's 85.35%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
69.80%
Similar operating margin growth to MU's 87.07%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
30.83%
Other expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
88.35%
Pre-tax income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
66.82%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 2.17%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
57.05%
Tax expense growth while MU reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
96.98%
Net income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
74.45%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 8.21%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
92.00%
EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
92.00%
Diluted EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.52%
Share count reduction below 50% of MU's 0.23%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-0.10%
Diluted share reduction while MU shows 0.23% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.