PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-8.07%
Revenue decline while MU shows 22.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-8.13%
Cost reduction while MU shows 21.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-8.02%
Gross profit decline while MU shows 27.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.06%
Margin expansion below 50% of MU's 3.82%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.87%
R&D growth less than half of MU's 18.14%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
134.53%
Other expenses growth less than half of MU's 4600.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
4.57%
Operating expenses growth less than half of MU's 35.16%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-3.00%
Total costs reduction while MU shows 23.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-70.24%
Interest expense reduction while MU shows 18.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.19%
D&A growth while MU reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-16.26%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.82%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-27.22%
Operating income decline while MU shows 38.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.82%
Operating margin decline while MU shows 13.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
79.66%
Other expenses growth less than half of MU's 1421.90%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-26.62%
Pre-tax income decline while MU shows 3126.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.18%
Pre-tax margin decline while MU shows 2531.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-72.76%
Tax expense reduction while MU shows 600.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-16.79%
Net income decline while MU shows 3872.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.48%
Net margin decline while MU shows 3138.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.65%
EPS decline while MU shows 4025.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.66%
Diluted EPS decline while MU shows 3675.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.35%
Share count reduction while MU shows 0.90% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.09%
Diluted share reduction while MU shows 7.91% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.