PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.62%
Revenue decline while MU shows 8.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-5.03%
Cost reduction while MU shows 3.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-2.43%
Gross profit decline while MU shows 18.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.24%
Margin expansion below 50% of MU's 9.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.71%
R&D reduction while MU shows 5.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
207.92%
Other expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.12%
Operating expenses growth less than half of MU's 3.36%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-2.65%
Total costs reduction while MU shows 3.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
44.56%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x MU's 2.27%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
0.45%
D&A growth less than half of MU's 15.42%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-1.17%
EBITDA decline while MU shows 24.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.54%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of MU's 23.52%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-7.22%
Operating income decline while MU shows 31.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.74%
Operating margin decline while MU shows 21.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
525.36%
Other expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-3.32%
Pre-tax income decline while MU shows 0.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.31%
Pre-tax margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.82%
Tax expense growth less than half of MU's 186.21%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-7.08%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.59%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.69%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.76%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.65%
Share count reduction while MU shows 0.19% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.20%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.