PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.00%
Positive growth while MU shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-2.96%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
2.44%
Positive growth while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.44%
Margin expansion while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.86%
Similar R&D growth to MU's 0.80%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-121.81%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
0.65%
Operating expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.24%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
0.48%
Interest expense growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.95%
D&A growth while MU reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
27.61%
EBITDA growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.93%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
7.81%
Operating income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.81%
Operating margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-165.14%
Other expenses reduction while MU shows 38.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.30%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.31%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.44%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-6.26%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.26%
Net margin decline while MU shows 2.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.33%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.33%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.16%
Share count reduction while MU shows 0.37% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.03%
Diluted share increase while MU reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.