PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.11%
Positive growth while MU shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
13.40%
Cost increase while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
9.33%
Positive growth while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.61%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.88%
R&D growth less than half of MU's 7.12%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
96.76%
Similar other expenses growth to MU's 108.33%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
1.66%
Operating expenses growth less than half of MU's 3.82%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
7.71%
Total costs growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.14%
Interest expense growth less than half of MU's 16.87%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-0.23%
D&A reduction while MU shows 4.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
23.32%
EBITDA growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
19.50%
EBITDA margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.72%
Operating income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
17.65%
Operating margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
50.00%
Similar other expenses growth to MU's 55.56%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
35.21%
Pre-tax income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.69%
Pre-tax margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
35.48%
Tax expense growth less than half of MU's 121.28%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
35.16%
Net income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.64%
Net margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
37.93%
EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
41.82%
Diluted EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.87%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-2.17%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.