PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.05%
Positive growth while MU shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.41%
Cost increase while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
3.38%
Positive growth while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.31%
Margin expansion while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.40%
R&D growth while MU reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
250.40%
Other expenses growth less than half of MU's 1900.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
1.10%
Operating expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.72%
Total costs growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.45%
Interest expense growth less than half of MU's 4.12%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-2.75%
D&A reduction while MU shows 5.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-73.35%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.36%
EBITDA margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.35%
Operating income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.18%
Operating margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.07%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of MU's 30.56%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
8.99%
Pre-tax income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.80%
Pre-tax margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.80%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
11.66%
Net income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.41%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 2.67%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
10.00%
EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.82%
Diluted EPS change of 12.82% while MU is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-0.66%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.29%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.