PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.17%
Positive growth while MU shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.22%
Cost increase while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-2.91%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.08%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.60%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.68%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
1.33%
Total costs growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.26%
D&A reduction while MU shows 4.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-44.12%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.14%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-56.82%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-56.89%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-58.14%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-58.21%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
21.05%
Tax expense growth less than half of MU's 225.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-80.60%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-80.63%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-78.33%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-78.33%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.46%
Share count reduction while MU shows 0.10% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-2.11%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.