PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
13.18%
Positive growth while MU shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
10.02%
Cost growth above 1.5x MU's 1.91%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
15.77%
Positive growth while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.29%
Margin expansion while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.81%
R&D growth while MU reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
400.00%
Other expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.56%
Operating expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.48%
Total costs growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.04%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
129.32%
EBITDA growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
35.34%
EBITDA margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
222.37%
Operating income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
184.82%
Operating margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.00%
Other expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
240.28%
Pre-tax income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
200.64%
Pre-tax margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-102.17%
Tax expense reduction while MU shows 200.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
846.15%
Net income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
735.95%
Net margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
746.15%
EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
746.15%
Diluted EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.18%
Share count increase while MU reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.62%
Diluted share change of 1.62% while MU is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.