PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
7.36%
Revenue growth 50-75% of MU's 11.01%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
6.83%
Cost growth 50-75% of MU's 9.92%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
7.77%
Gross profit growth below 50% of MU's 16.27%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.38%
Margin expansion below 50% of MU's 4.74%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.56%
R&D growth 50-75% of MU's 7.59%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.33%
Other expenses reduction while MU shows 103.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
4.99%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of MU's 6.67%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
5.99%
Total costs growth 50-75% of MU's 9.33%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.17%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
2.30%
EBITDA growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.10%
EBITDA margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.86%
Operating income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.19%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.27%
Pre-tax income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.81%
Pre-tax margin decline while MU shows 5.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4700.00%
Tax expense growth while MU reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-15.85%
Net income decline while MU shows 20.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.62%
Net margin decline while MU shows 28.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.64%
EPS decline while MU shows 19.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.00%
Diluted EPS decline while MU shows 23.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.55%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
4.96%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MU's 0.10%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.