PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.81%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-1.28%
Cost reduction while MU shows 1.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-0.55%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.26%
Margin expansion while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.41%
R&D reduction while MU shows 2.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.67%
Other expenses growth less than half of MU's 160.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
0.29%
Operating expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.52%
Total costs reduction while MU shows 0.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
108.33%
Interest expense growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.94%
D&A growth while MU reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.85%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.06%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.41%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.61%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-80.77%
Other expenses reduction while MU shows 68.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.44%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.66%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.03%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-3.47%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.69%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.13%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.63%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.33%
Share count reduction below 50% of MU's 0.36%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.16%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x MU's 0.35%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.