PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
25.52%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 8.02%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
47.86%
Cost growth above 1.5x MU's 13.62%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
13.52%
Positive growth while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-9.56%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
35.65%
R&D growth while MU reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
57.98%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x MU's 13.33%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
52.80%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MU's 13.57%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
116.00%
Interest expense growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
277.57%
D&A growth above 1.5x MU's 4.17%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-4.13%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-23.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-33.30%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-46.86%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-940.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-37.92%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-50.54%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-120.31%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-32.17%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-45.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-32.43%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-32.43%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.33%
Share count reduction below 50% of MU's 0.45%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.64%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MU's 0.79%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.