PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
13.15%
Positive growth while MU shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
10.08%
Cost increase while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
14.95%
Positive growth while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.59%
Margin expansion while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.52%
R&D growth 50-75% of MU's 0.99%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1250.00%
Other expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.39%
Operating expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.98%
Total costs growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.09%
D&A reduction while MU shows 3.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
31.38%
EBITDA growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.11%
EBITDA margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
29.79%
Operating income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.71%
Operating margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
337.84%
Other expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
39.05%
Pre-tax income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
22.89%
Pre-tax margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
915.38%
Tax expense growth while MU reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
31.23%
Net income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.98%
Net margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.51%
EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
31.03%
Diluted EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.32%
Share count increase while MU reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.16%
Diluted share increase while MU reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.