PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
14.94%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 1.29%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
12.80%
Cost increase while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
16.15%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 3.11%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1.05%
Margin expansion 50-75% of MU's 1.80%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
7.98%
R&D growth 50-75% of MU's 11.24%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-97.04%
Other expenses reduction while MU shows 193.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
5.86%
Operating expenses growth less than half of MU's 25.56%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
9.66%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MU's 4.32%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
13.21%
Interest expense growth 50-75% of MU's 22.22%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
1.78%
D&A growth less than half of MU's 4.25%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
15.22%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 1.63%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.24%
EBITDA margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.95%
Operating income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.70%
Operating margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-156.82%
Other expenses reduction while MU shows 66.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
17.12%
Pre-tax income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.90%
Pre-tax margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-84.85%
Tax expense reduction while MU shows 16.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
24.16%
Net income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.02%
Net margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.38%
EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.68%
Diluted EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.36%
Share count change of 0.36% while MU is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.16%
Diluted share change of 0.16% while MU is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.