PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
7.60%
Positive growth while MU shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
6.96%
Cost increase while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
7.95%
Positive growth while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.32%
Margin expansion while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.49%
R&D growth 50-75% of MU's 8.54%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-340.91%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
3.52%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of MU's 5.69%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
5.44%
Total costs growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.61%
Interest expense reduction while MU shows 2.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.69%
D&A growth 1.1-1.25x MU's 3.35%. Bill Ackman would demand investment justification.
7.91%
EBITDA growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.28%
EBITDA margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.19%
Operating income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.34%
Operating margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-218.18%
Other expenses reduction while MU shows 420.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
8.61%
Pre-tax income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.93%
Pre-tax margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-179.31%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
21.88%
Net income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.26%
Net margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.21%
EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.71%
Diluted EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.20%
Share count increase while MU reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.28%
Diluted share increase while MU reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.