PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.44%
Positive growth while MU shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
8.06%
Cost increase while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
8.64%
Positive growth while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.19%
Margin expansion while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
10.37%
R&D growth above 1.5x MU's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
75.47%
Other expenses growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 52.17%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize cost items.
8.92%
Operating expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.43%
Total costs growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.48%
Similar interest expense growth to MU's 13.33%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
8.09%
D&A growth above 1.5x MU's 2.07%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-31.78%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.48%
EBITDA margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-37.10%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-42.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
40.00%
Other expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-37.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-41.90%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
235.51%
Tax expense growth while MU reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-46.12%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-50.31%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-45.83%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-46.67%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.08%
Share count increase while MU reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.31%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.