PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-19.11%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
32.62%
Cost growth 50-75% of MU's 53.48%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
-46.33%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-33.64%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
12.73%
R&D growth while MU reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.54%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x MU's 27.27%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
9.32%
Operating expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
22.46%
Total costs growth 50-75% of MU's 38.05%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-4.41%
Interest expense reduction while MU shows 74.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
13.17%
D&A growth above 1.5x MU's 1.09%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-58.41%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-68.12%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-73.29%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-66.98%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
61.90%
Similar other expenses growth to MU's 60.00%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
-73.68%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-67.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-196.79%
Tax expense reduction while MU shows 575.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-59.46%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-49.88%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-60.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-59.38%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.44%
Share count reduction while MU shows 0.09% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.83%
Diluted share reduction while MU shows 0.09% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.