PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
17.83%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 12.37%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
6.14%
Similar cost growth to MU's 6.94%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
21.53%
Similar gross profit growth to MU's 22.32%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
3.14%
Margin expansion below 50% of MU's 8.85%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.34%
R&D growth while MU reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-71.26%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
10.07%
Operating expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.61%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MU's 4.93%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
1.59%
Interest expense growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.94%
D&A growth above 1.5x MU's 2.22%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
21.96%
EBITDA growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 18.39%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
3.51%
EBITDA margin growth 50-75% of MU's 5.36%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
24.20%
Operating income growth 50-75% of MU's 42.84%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
5.41%
Operating margin growth below 50% of MU's 27.11%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-24.80%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
22.49%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 5.10%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
3.96%
Pre-tax margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
31.69%
Tax expense growth while MU reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
21.13%
Net income growth below 50% of MU's 110.82%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.80%
Net margin growth below 50% of MU's 87.61%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
20.00%
EPS growth below 50% of MU's 110.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
22.45%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of MU's 111.39%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.16%
Share count reduction while MU shows 0.27% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.04%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.