PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
15.34%
Positive growth while MU shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
32.42%
Cost increase while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
10.62%
Positive growth while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-4.09%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
13.60%
R&D growth above 1.5x MU's 1.13%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while MU shows 450.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
12.44%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x MU's 1.36%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
24.77%
Total costs growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.69%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
5.61%
D&A growth while MU reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.01%
EBITDA growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.75%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
10.25%
Operating income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.42%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
54.59%
Other expenses growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 37.48%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize cost items.
11.20%
Pre-tax income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.59%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.05%
Tax expense growth less than half of MU's 37.46%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
11.54%
Net income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.29%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
13.33%
EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.67%
Diluted EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.17%
Share count reduction while MU shows 0.36% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.17%
Diluted share reduction while MU shows 0.09% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.