PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
24.36%
Positive growth while TSM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
22.03%
Cost growth of 22.03% while TSM maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
27.92%
Positive growth while TSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.87%
Margin change of 2.87% while TSM shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
14.81%
R&D change of 14.81% while TSM maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.08%
Operating expenses change of 14.08% while TSM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
19.56%
Total costs change of 19.56% while TSM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.33%
D&A change of 8.33% while TSM maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
48.74%
EBITDA growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
19.60%
Margin change of 19.60% while TSM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
58.95%
Operating income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
27.81%
Margin change of 27.81% while TSM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
66.67%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x TSM's 0.07%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
59.18%
Income change of 59.18% while TSM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
28.00%
Margin change of 28.00% while TSM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
61.29%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x TSM's 0.07%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
58.21%
Net income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
27.22%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 0.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
60.00%
EPS change of 60.00% while TSM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
50.00%
Diluted EPS change of 50.00% while TSM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
5.47%
Share count increase while TSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.47%
Diluted share increase while TSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.