PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
15.64%
Positive growth while TSM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
17.02%
Cost growth of 17.02% while TSM maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
13.58%
Positive growth while TSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.78%
Margin decline while TSM shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
15.78%
R&D change of 15.78% while TSM maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.29%
Operating expenses growth less than half of TSM's 100.00%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
14.24%
Total costs growth less than half of TSM's 100.00%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.37%
D&A change of 3.37% while TSM maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
20.44%
EBITDA growth below 50% of TSM's 149.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.15%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of TSM's 165.58%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
22.90%
Operating income growth below 50% of TSM's 149.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.28%
Operating margin growth below 50% of TSM's 165.58%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
89.71%
Other expenses growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
25.08%
Income change of 25.08% while TSM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
8.16%
Margin change of 8.16% while TSM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
24.71%
Tax expense growth less than half of TSM's 77.72%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
25.25%
Net income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.31%
Net margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
50.00%
EPS growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-15.63%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
3.57%
Diluted share increase while TSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.