PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
14.76%
Positive growth while TSM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
14.93%
Cost growth of 14.93% while TSM maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
14.50%
Positive growth while TSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.22%
Margin decline while TSM shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
12.96%
R&D change of 12.96% while TSM maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.26%
Operating expenses change of 15.26% while TSM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
15.01%
Total costs change of 15.01% while TSM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.80%
D&A change of 7.80% while TSM maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
12.91%
EBITDA growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.61%
EBITDA margin decline while TSM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
13.53%
Operating income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.07%
Operating margin decline while TSM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
208.58%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x TSM's 5.20%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
23.16%
Income change of 23.16% while TSM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
7.32%
Margin change of 7.32% while TSM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
23.17%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x TSM's 5.19%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
23.16%
Net income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.32%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 0.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-41.67%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-40.00%
Diluted EPS decline while TSM shows 120.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
103.97%
Share count increase while TSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
104.39%
Diluted share increase while TSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.