PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
16.30%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 0.52%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
16.43%
Cost growth of 16.43% while TSM maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
16.08%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 0.52%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.18%
Margin decline while TSM shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
9.34%
R&D change of 9.34% while TSM maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.32%
Operating expenses change of 8.32% while TSM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
14.25%
Total costs change of 14.25% while TSM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.02%
D&A change of 31.02% while TSM maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
26.76%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 0.52%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
9.00%
Margin change of 9.00% while TSM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
26.27%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 0.52%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
8.58%
Margin change of 8.58% while TSM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
12.98%
Other expenses growth while TSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
24.62%
Income change of 24.62% while TSM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
7.16%
Margin change of 7.16% while TSM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
24.62%
Tax expense growth while TSM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
24.62%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 0.52%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
7.16%
Margin change of 7.16% while TSM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
157.14%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 1.52%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
150.00%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 1.52%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-48.95%
Share count reduction while TSM shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-49.43%
Diluted share reduction while TSM shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.