PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.12%
Revenue growth below 50% of TSM's 28.25%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
8.79%
Cost growth of 8.79% while TSM maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
12.17%
Gross profit growth below 50% of TSM's 28.25%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.86%
Margin change of 1.86% while TSM shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
20.07%
R&D change of 20.07% while TSM maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.13%
Operating expenses change of 17.13% while TSM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
10.92%
Total costs change of 10.92% while TSM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.43%
D&A change of 14.43% while TSM maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
7.41%
EBITDA growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.46%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.58%
Operating income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.22%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
42.92%
Other expenses growth less than half of TSM's 378.67%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
10.65%
Income change of 10.65% while TSM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
0.48%
Margin change of 0.48% while TSM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
10.64%
Tax expense growth while TSM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.66%
Similar net income growth to TSM's 13.87%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
0.49%
Net margin growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-11.11%
EPS decline while TSM shows 383.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
6.67%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of TSM's 383.58%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
22.61%
Share count increase while TSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.61%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of TSM's 0.05%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.