PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.41%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 6.19%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
9.37%
Cost growth of 9.37% while TSM maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
11.96%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 6.19%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1.41%
Margin change of 1.41% while TSM shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
18.01%
R&D change of 18.01% while TSM maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.76%
Operating expenses growth less than half of TSM's 100.00%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
8.13%
Total costs growth less than half of TSM's 100.00%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.68%
D&A change of 23.68% while TSM maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
9.67%
EBITDA growth below 50% of TSM's 148.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
30.76%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of TSM's 146.02%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-19.51%
Operating income decline while TSM shows 148.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-27.10%
Operating margin decline while TSM shows 146.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-33.57%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-19.09%
Pre-tax income decline while TSM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.72%
Pre-tax margin decline while TSM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.14%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-16.72%
Net income decline while TSM shows 38.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.57%
Net margin decline while TSM shows 30.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.75%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-14.34%
Share count reduction while TSM shows 15.60% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
2.39%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x TSM's 11.51%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.