PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.02%
Positive growth while TSM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
9.41%
Cost growth of 9.41% while TSM maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
5.99%
Positive growth while TSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.88%
Margin decline while TSM shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
8.31%
R&D change of 8.31% while TSM maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.82%
Operating expenses change of 13.82% while TSM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
10.56%
Total costs change of 10.56% while TSM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
71.35%
D&A change of 71.35% while TSM maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
14.74%
EBITDA growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-16.40%
EBITDA margin decline while TSM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
44.10%
Operating income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.40%
Margin change of 33.40% while TSM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-39.42%
Other expenses reduction while TSM shows 4.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
29.80%
Income change of 29.80% while TSM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
20.16%
Margin change of 20.16% while TSM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
29.80%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x TSM's 4.57%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
29.80%
Net income growth while TSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.16%
Margin change of 20.16% while TSM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
25.00%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 5.32%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
23.08%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x TSM's 5.32%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2.33%
Share count increase while TSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.77%
Diluted share increase while TSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.